Letters,
Government,
Criminal,
Constitutional Law
Sep. 26, 2012
Death penalty report author responds to accusations
It is wrong to ascribe a nefarious purpose to the timing of the publication of the law review article on the costs of the state's death penalty program. By Paula M. Mitchell
Paula M. Mitchell
Loyola Law SchoolIf educating voters "sways" them to vote in a certain direction then that must certainly be a good thing, because an informed electorate is essential to any successful democracy. But it was wrong for The Daily Journal to ascribe a nefarious purpose to the timing of the publication of the law review article I co-wrote with Senior 9th Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcón, published last week in the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. ("Report attempts to sway voters to quash death pena...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In