This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Constitutional Law

Sep. 25, 2012

Crawford update: Part Two

Earn MCLE credit polishing your knowledge of evidence rules regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to confrontation as applied to forensic analysis of evidence.

Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse

Elia V. Pirozzi

Assigned Judge

Criminal

The objective of this article and accompanying self-study test is to provide readers with the latest developments concerning Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and the Sixth Amendment's right to confrontation as applied to forensic analysis of evidence. Part One of this article, printed Aug. 27, provided a review of the Crawford opinion discussing the definition of "testimonial" statements and assessing the unavailability of a hearsay declarant and a defendant's pr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails