This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Data Privacy

Feb. 13, 2015

Improving landscape for defendants monitoring calls

Recent Court of Appeal rulings may have limited the instances in which plaintiffs can seek class certification under the California Invasion of Privacy Act or undisclosed recordings. By Lisa Gilford and Dominique M. Caamano


By Lisa Gilford and Dominique Caamano


Business entities' alleged failure to provide sufficient disclosures for call monitoring or recording has spurred many class actions in California for purported violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), which imposes civil and criminal penalties on an individual or company that intentionally "eavesdrops upon or records [a] confidential communication" and engages in this conduct "without ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up