This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jul. 10, 2013

Decision limits exposure for medical device manufacturers

This holding heralds far-reaching and positive implications for medical device manufacturers that conduct business in California. By Matthew L. Marshall


By Matthew L. Marshall


Affirming a lower court's decision, a California appellate court found that the presence of a medical device manufacturer's sales representative during surgery did not in and of itself give rise to a duty of care owed to the patient. This holding heralds far-reaching and positive implications for medical device manufacturers that conduct business in California.

Smith v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2013 DJDAR 7911 (C...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up