Labor/Employment
Apr. 17, 2012
Brinker: The long and winding road comes to an end
Brinker puts employers on alert to draft clear and concise policies, and to ensure that they are uniformly implemented and applied. By Allison M. Dibley, Veronica M. Gray, and John T. Kennedy of Nossaman LLP
Veronica M. Gray
Nossaman LLP
18101 Von Karman Ave #1800
Irvine , CA 92612
Phone: 949-477-7663
Email: vgray@nossaman.com
On April 12, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) Case No. S166350, holding that employers need only provide meal and rest periods, not ensure they are taken, and that employers are not required to provide a meal period every five hours. However, the Supreme Court also held that the Court of Appeal went...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In