Law Practice
Nov. 23, 2006
Taking Confusion Past Hearsay Hurdle
FOCUS COLUMN - By Chad J. Levy and Erica S. Alterwitz - Evidence of actual confusion, or the lack thereof, is often the dispositive factor in trademark infringement cases.
By Chad J. Levy and Erica S. Alterwitz
Evidence of actual confusion, or the lack thereof, is often the dispositive factor in trademark infringement cases. Over the last dozen years, the Central and Northern Districts of California have issued conflicting rulings on the admissibility of testimony concerning conversations with third parties to prove actual confusion.
&n...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In