This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Mergers & Acquisitions

May 1, 2015

The dark side of shareholder litigation

It turns out acquiring firms experience better stock reaction to deals in states with so-called universal demand laws. By Yongqiang Chu and Yijia Zhao


By Yongqiang Chu and Yijia Zhao


Between late 1980s and mid-2000s, 23 states passed the universal demand laws, which
created significant obstacles for corporate shareholders to initiate derivative litigation
against directors and executives of companies incorporated in states that adopted
these laws. We obtain and analyze more than a thousand U.S. public company M&A transactions
between 1980 and 2012...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up