This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Perspective

Apr. 29, 2015

It's not for the justices to decide

The Constitution does not define marriage; it dictates no choice among competing conceptions of what marriage is. Rather, it leaves the issue to the judgment of the people and their elected representatives. By Robert P. George


By Robert P. George


If marriage is simply a form of sexual-romantic companionship or domestic partnership,
then the equal protection clause requires the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down state
laws limiting marriage licenses to male-female partners. For there would be no principled
basis for distinguishing opposite- from same-sex relationships - or, for that matter,
from multiple-party ("polyamorous...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up