This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental

Oct. 26, 2001

Landowners Are Not Liable For 'Passive' Contamination

SAN FRANCISCO - Contamination that simply oozes through the soil does not constitute "disposal," and thus some property owners may be relieved of footing the bill for toxic cleanups on their land, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday in an 8-3 decision.

By Dennis Pfaff
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Contamination that simply oozes through the soil does not constitute "disposal," and thus some property owners may be relieved of footing the bill for toxic cleanups on their land, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday in an 8-3 decision.
    &nbs...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up