This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

May 11, 2012

Brinker’s unique impact on the health care industry

Commentary about the decision often ignores an important aspect of it: the IWA's authority to issue industry-related rules. By Daniel J. McQueen of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Daniel J. McQueen

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles , CA 90071

Email: dmcqueen@sheppardmullin.com

By Daniel J. McQueen

Much has been written about the Supreme Court's recent holding in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court and its impact on meal and rest period rules. Somewhat hidden away in the opinion, however, are several important holdings from the Court about the unique meal period regulations that apply to the state's hospitals.

According to the Hospital Association of Southern California (HASC), there are currently 367 acute-care ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails