I nearly fell out of my chair during a recent lunch with a Big Law partner. He was actually suggesting that his firm establish a subsidiary to handle lower-end work, not only for their existing clients, but to possibly win work from companies that had always considered his firm out-of-reach. He didn't seem at all concerned about diluting the brand. Wow, I thought: This is so rare among Big Law partners. Or is it? Maybe others were thinking along the same lines, but weren't in a position to...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In