This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Zoning, Planning and Use

Jan. 6, 1999

Rent Control Is Not a Taking, Court Decides

Narrowly rejecting an innovative attack on rent control, a closely divided California Supreme Court ruled Monday that a landlord may not seek compensation for an unlawful "taking" on the theory that a rent control ordinance has failed to achieve its stated goals of relieving a housing shortage.

By Philip Carrizosa
Daily Journal Senior Writer
        Narrowly rejecting an innovative attack on rent control, a closely divided California Supreme Court ruled Monday that a landlord may not seek compensation for an unlawful "taking" on the theory that a rent control ordinance has failed to achieve its stated goals of relieving a housing shortage.
...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails