Perspective
Aug. 24, 2016
Clarifying roles in eminent domain cases
Last week, the California Supreme Court answered two questions relating to the valuation of a strip of land condemned for roadway purposes. By Gale Connor
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Perris v. Stamper, 2016 DJDAR 8382 (Aug. 15, 2016), in which it answered two questions relating to the valuation of a strip of land condemned for roadway purposes. First, the Court held that the judge, not the jury, must decide any challenge to the constitutionality of a dedication requirement. The second question, whether a city's dedication requirement ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In