This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate/Development,
Government,
Administrative/Regulatory

Feb. 8, 2013

Infill or greenfield development? Or is planning key?

In planning and development circles, it is the heavyweight grudge match: infill development versus greenfield development.

Ann Catherine Norian

DLA Piper LLP (US)

Elisa L. Paster

Glaser Weil

Email: epaster@glaserweil.com

In planning and development circles, it is the heavyweight grudge match: infill development versus greenfield development. Countless pages and blogosphere space have been devoted to bolstering the merits of one development paradigm or the other, most recently focusing on Arthur C. Nelson's white paper "The New California Dream: How Demographic and Economic Trends May Shape the Housing Market," which found that future demand will be mostly for multifamily housing and small lot (under 5,00...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails