Criminal,
California Supreme Court,
State Bar & Bar Associations
May 5, 2017
Prosecutor rule edit reflects concerns
It was fitting the that the California Supreme Court's first order responding to the proposed revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct addressed Proposed Rule 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor.
Gary Schons
Of Counsel
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Public Law
655 W Broadway Ste 1500
San Diego , CA 92101
Phone: (619) 525-1348
Fax: (619) 233-6118
Email: gary.schons@bbklaw.com
U San Diego School of Law
It was fitting the that the California Supreme Court's first order responding to the State Bar Board of Trustees' proposed revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct addressed Proposed Rule 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor, modeled on ABA Rule 3.8, which would have replaced current Rule 5-110. That proposed rule (along with Rule 5-220, Suppression of Evidence) was sent by the board to the court on an expedited basis in October of last year, well ahead of the 70 odd rules r...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In