Judges and Judiciary
Dec. 28, 2006
Hearing Evidence Isn't Necessarily Considering It
FORUM COLUMN - By Michael Halley - Controversy over the instructions given to California jurors for weighing mitigating evidence in capital cases has long plagued the courts.
By Michael Halley
Controversy over the instructions given to California jurors for weighing mitigating evidence in capital cases has long plagued the courts. The latest example is the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Ayers v. Belmontes, 2006 DJDAR 14923 (U.S. Sct. Nov. 13, 2006).
In 1982, Fernando Belmontes was convicted of murder in...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In