This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jun. 16, 2016

Leave settlement agreements out of your 998 offers

In Sanford v. Rasnick, the California Court of Appeal invalidated a Section 998 offer because it required a "written settlement agreement." By Melissa McCormick

By Melissa R. McCormick

Most California litigators are familiar with Code of Civil Procedure Section 998, a statute that enables parties to obtain cost-shifting if a trial outcome is less favorable than a settlement offer. Section 998 provides, among other things, that if a party who prevails at trial obtains a judgment less favorable than a pretrial 998 offer, the prevailing party may not recover its own post-offer costs and must also pay the ot...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up