This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters,
Labor/Employment

Aug. 19, 2014

LETTER: We all have incentives

Why persist, like most defense attorneys, in emphasizing the financial incentives to plaintiffs' attorneys who successfully represent victims of wage theft? By David A. Rosen

David A. Rosen

Judge (Ret.), neutral
ADR Services

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

Richard Simmons' expertise in employer representation is unquestioned, and his article summarizing the state of our law after the Brinker decision was mostly objective, and in any case, informative. ["As the Brinker dust settles, review what we learned," Aug. 12.]

Why, though, must he persist, like most defense attorneys, in emphasizing the financial incentives to plaintiffs' attorneys who successfully repr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up