Appellate Practice
May 27, 2006
Delaying Tactic du Jour Fails to Remove Matter de Jure
Focus Column - By Benjamin G. Shatz - A common defense tactic in litigation is to inject procedural complication to delay reaching the merits. One typical stratagem in that regard is to remove a case from state to federal court.
Benjamin G. Shatz
Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP
Appellate Law (Certified), Litigation
Email: bshatz@manatt.com
Benjamin is a certified specialist in appellate law who co-chairs the Appellate Practice Group at Manatt in the firm's Los Angeles office. Exceptionally Appealing appears the first Tuesday of the month.
A common defense tactic in litigation is to inject procedural complication to delay reaching the merits. One typical stratagem in that regard is to remove a case from state to federal court. The snag with that approach, however, is that without grounds for federal jurisdiction, the delay will be short-lived.
The removal and remand process moves at a fairly quick pace, and district court judges jealously protect their limited jurisdiction. A crafty defense lawyer, recognizing the...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In