This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 16, 2016

Not the first rodeo for patents asserted against Apple

In trying to read the tea leaves on the case recently filed against Apple Inc. and Broadcom by the Caltech, a telling document in the pleadings includes Caltech's notice of potentially related cases. By K. Brian Bathurst

By K. Brian Bathurst

In trying to read the tea leaves on the case recently filed on May 26 against Apple Inc. and Broadcom by the California Institute of Technology, California Institute of Technology v. Broadcom Ltd., 16-3714 (C.D. Cal.), a telling document in the pleadings includes Caltech's notice of potentially related cases. In Caltech's notice, it discloses that the same patents-in-suit being asserted against Apple were previously a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up