Intellectual Property
Jun. 10, 2013
Oprah's trademark woes provide cautionary tale
Being tertiary and often descriptive in nature, catch phrases may not be searched and cleared in the usual trademark approval process of many companies. By Richard Kirkpatrick and Laura Gustafson
A trademark "trap for the unwary" is spotlighted by a May 31 opinion by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Kelly-Brown v Oprah Winfrey, 2013 WL 2360999 (2d Cir 2013).
The practical problem illustrated by the case is the very common use in advertising of short phrases in connection with primary or secondary brands. Such "catch phrases" are often intended not to function as permanen...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In