Perspective
Dec. 15, 2011
Law surrounding Klopping claims now less muddy
Klopping claims require actual, targeted interference with specific property rights. By Mona M. Nemat of Best Best & Krieger LLP
For decades, public entity lawyers have been advising their clients to walk the tight rope between disseminating information about potential projects to those who may be affected, and balancing that with clear statements that no condemnation decision has been made. For years, these same public entity lawyers have been defending claims of unreasonable precondemnation conduct, i.e. Klopping claims, because property owners insist that the dis...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In