This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Bankruptcy

Oct. 25, 2011

Stern v. Marshall bankruptcy case: bombshell or dud?

Will the Anna Nicole Smith bankruptcy decision wreak havoc in the bankruptcy courts?

Eric Fromme

Theodora Oringher PC

Email: efromme@tocounsel.com

Caroline Djang

Rutan & Tucker, LLP

Email: cdjang@rutan.com

Since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) in June of this year, much has been written about the case - especially its potential impact on the bankruptcy courts. In Stern, the Supreme Court held that a bankruptcy court could not, as a constitutional matter, enter a final judgment on a counterclaim that did not arise under the Bankruptcy Code or in a bankruptcy case, even though 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(C) expressly permits it to do...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails