U.S. Supreme Court
Jan. 22, 2010
Court Ruling Spotlights Donor Disclosure
In striking down restrictions on independent corporate spending in elections, one U.S. Supreme Court Justice had an eye on the legal battle over California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative that outlawed gay marriage.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
WASHINGTON - In deciding Thursday to strike down restrictions on independent corporate spending in elections, one U.S. Supreme Court Justice had an eye on the legal battle over California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative that outlawed gay marriage.
Justice Clarence Thomas was the only justice to dissent over the issue of whether the names of donors should be disclosed if they ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In