This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Roundtable-Intellectual Property

Dec. 1, 2008

Intellectual Property

An update with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Hogan & Hartson; and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.

This fall, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down decisions in Qualcomm v. Broadcom and In re: Bilski, which have generated a flurry of discussions about their potential effects on patent litigation--and raised questions that will likely have to be settled through future litigation. As a result of Qualcomm, where the court ruled that juries could consider opinion letters from outside counsel in inducement cases, practitioners are now ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up