Law Practice
Nov. 10, 2008
Panel Finds Brands Liable For Generics
Makers of brand-name pharmaceuticals can be sued for failing to warn of a drug's dangers, even when it was the generic version that caused harm, an appellate court in San Francisco ruled Friday.
By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer Makers of brand-name pharmaceuticals can be sued for failing to warn of a drug's dangers, even when it was the generic version that caused harm, an appellate court in San Francisco ruled Friday. The ruling was the first of its kind in California and departed from rulings in other states, which have held that manufacturers can't be held liable for drugs they did not make or sell. 'Rooted in Co...
Daily Journal Staff Writer Makers of brand-name pharmaceuticals can be sued for failing to warn of a drug's dangers, even when it was the generic version that caused harm, an appellate court in San Francisco ruled Friday. The ruling was the first of its kind in California and departed from rulings in other states, which have held that manufacturers can't be held liable for drugs they did not make or sell. 'Rooted in Co...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In