Features
Oct. 1, 2006
Letters to the Editor
By George!
Regrettably, from the sound of matters, meaningless statistics mean everything to Professor Gerald Uelmen in his article on the George Court ["Meeting in the Middle," July]. Indeed, whereas dissent is implicitly deemed bad, and conversely, unanimity is good, we are left believing that truly pedestrian judicial performance by our chief justice is somehow to be glorified. After all, "Twenty years after Californians pu...
Regrettably, from the sound of matters, meaningless statistics mean everything to Professor Gerald Uelmen in his article on the George Court ["Meeting in the Middle," July]. Indeed, whereas dissent is implicitly deemed bad, and conversely, unanimity is good, we are left believing that truly pedestrian judicial performance by our chief justice is somehow to be glorified. After all, "Twenty years after Californians pu...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In