By David Island and Daniel P. Westman
For all practical purposes, the peremptory challenge may have lost its raison d'être. Until fairly recently, a trial lawyer did not need a reason to exercise a peremptory challenge. The attorney could remove a prospective juror for no reason at all, or for some private, even bigoted, rea...
For all practical purposes, the peremptory challenge may have lost its raison d'être. Until fairly recently, a trial lawyer did not need a reason to exercise a peremptory challenge. The attorney could remove a prospective juror for no reason at all, or for some private, even bigoted, rea...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In