This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Community News

Jan. 4, 2018

The case for treating basketball like a courtroom brief

Nate Duncan and Danny LeRoux are conducting a grand experiment to answer the question: What if you took the logic and empiriciscm of being a lawyer and applied it to basketball?

The case for treating basketball like a courtroom brief
Nate Duncan and Danny LeRoux have let their bar licenses lapse as they pursue a podcast about the National Basketball Association that emphasizes legal knowledge and statistical analysis.

Nate Duncan and Danny LeRoux are conducting an experiment to answer the question: What if you took the logic and empiricism of being a lawyer and applied it to basketball?

Many people get into sports before they can read and write, and sports analysis has traditionally possessed an infantile quality from the venerable, cigar-chomping sportswriter — “I just don’t like the look of that left fielder” — to sophistry — “Watch out for Jone...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up