Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Mar. 23, 2018
State high court tightens rules on anti-SLAPP motions
The state Supreme Court on Thursday tightened the procedural timeline for filing motions to dismiss strategic lawsuits against public participation.
The state Supreme Court on Thursday tightened the procedural timeline for filing motions to dismiss strategic lawsuits against public participation.
The high court affirmed a 4th District Court of Appeal decision that defendants can only file anti-SLAPP motions past the 60-day time limit for claims alleged in an amended complaint if they were not included in an earlier version of the lawsuit.
The ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Procedure
Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism
Defendant filing anti-SLAPP motion must move to strike within 60 days of service of the earliest complaint containing the cause of action defendant is attempting to strike.
