This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Civil Rights

Sep. 6, 2018

Defense’s main witness rebuts key plaintiffs’ witness in voting system trial

The defense’s main witness in the bench trial over Santa Monica’s election system said Wednesday there was no discriminatory intent behind the city’s switch to at-large voting — a direct rebuttal to a key plaintiffs’ witness.

LOS ANGELES -- The defense's main witness in the bench trial over Santa Monica's election system said Wednesday there was no discriminatory intent behind the city's switch to at-large voting -- a direct rebuttal to a key plaintiffs' witness.

Allan Lichtman, an outspoken American University history professor best known for predicting the outcome of presidential elections, has been called by city defense counsel Gibson, Dunn & Cru...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up