Civil Litigation,
Constitutional Law,
California Courts of Appeal
Oct. 30, 2018
Strange things are afoot in this takings decision
Why strange? First of all,the property owners won. In itself, that is noteworthy. The second strangeness is that, notwithstanding the opinion's noteworthy nature the Court of Appeal did not certify it to see the light of day.
Michael M. Berger
Senior Counsel
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles , CA 90067
Phone: (310) 312-4185
Fax: (310) 996-6968
Email: mmberger@manatt.com
USC Law School
Michael M. Berger is senior counsel at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, where he is co-chair of the Appellate Practice Group. He has argued four takings cases in the U.S. Supreme Court.
TAKINGS TALK
A decision relating to takings law in California was recently filed by the Court of Appeal in San Francisco. San Francisco SRO Hotel Coalition v. City and County of San Francisco, A151847 (Oct. 15, 2018) [ruling attached below]. There are two strange things about the opinion. First, the court ruled in the property owners' favor. Second, the appellate opinion was not certified for publication.
...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In