Civil Litigation
Nov. 2, 2018
High speed rail foes dealt a setback in court
A Sacramento County judge has rejected a motion by opponents of California’s High Speed Rail project to declare a law necessary to its funding unconstitutional.
SACRAMENTO -- A judge has rejected a motion by opponents of California's high speed rail project to declare a law necessary to its funding unconstitutional.
The rail project's opponents -- the plaintiffs in the case -- might seek an expedited appeal.
In their motion, plaintiffs claimed a 2016 law to allow the use of $1.1 billion in bond funds for "local passenger rail" services that would operate ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Judge on verge of dismissing key challenge to high speed rail project
Oct. 29, 2018
By Malcolm Maclachlan
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Litigation
Embattled high-speed rail project scores a court victory
May 2, 2017
By Malcolm Maclachlan
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Government
High speed rail opponents hope property litigation slows project
Jan. 7, 2015
By Paul Jones
By Paul Jones
