Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Dec. 6, 2018
Shook Hardy disqualified from representing Monster Energy
A federal judge disqualified a partner at Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP from representing Monster Energy Co. in a false advertising and unfair competition lawsuit against Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc. in Riverside County after finding the attorney had previously represented the opposing party.
A federal judge disqualified a partner at Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP from representing Monster Energy Co. in a false advertising and unfair competition lawsuit against Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc. in Riverside County after finding the attorney had previously represented the opposing party.
U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal disqualified lead Monster attorney Marc P...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
3rd trial over Monster energy drink may go to verdict
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
Monster Energy fights in state high court and Riverside Superior Court
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Litigation, Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Beverage company says plaintiff’s counsel’s press release could taint jury
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Litigation, Civil Rights
Rare trial over Monster drinks starts in Riverside
By Laurinda Keys
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property
Trademark lawsuit pits auto tool company against energy drink maker
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation
Federal lawsuit filed against energy drink claiming to cure Alzheimer’s
By Matthew Sanderson
