Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Feb. 7, 2019
State high court considers whether ‘intermittent’ worker must arbitrate claims
The state Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday over whether the San Francisco Giants can compel a security guard’s wage and hour claim to arbitration.
SACRAMENTO -- The state Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday over whether the San Francisco Giants can compel a security guard's wage and hour claim into arbitration.
The case could change the relationship of "intermittent" workers with their employers. The guard's attorneys claim he is not bound by a collective bargaining agreement requiring arbitration. Melendez et al. v. San Francisco Baseball Associates...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Arbitration
Melendrez v. San Francisco Baseball Association LLC
Motion to compel arbitration erroneously denied where federal preemption applies given that resolution of controversy necessarily requires interpretation of parties' collective bargaining...
Employment Law
Smith v. Superior Court (L'Oreal USA Inc.)
Employer effectuates 'discharge' within meaning of Labor Code when it fires employee or when it releases employee upon completion of job assignment.
