Civil Litigation
Feb. 8, 2019
Attorneys squabble over alleged misrepresentation during Johnson & Johnson trial
Attorneys ended up a heated exchange Thursday over testimony by a scientist as both sides accused the other of misrepresenting deposition statements made by the plaintiff’s mother about where she bought Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products alleged to be contaminated with asbestos.
OAKLAND -- Attorneys ended up in a heated exchange Thursday over testimony by a scientist as both sides accused the other of misrepresenting deposition statements made by the plaintiff's mother about where she bought Johnson & Johnson's talc-based products alleged to be contaminated with asbestos.
The defense argued the expert witness had no foundation to speak on the matter by reading an excerpt from the deposition, which the p...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
