U.S. Supreme Court,
Securities,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Apr. 24, 2019
US Supreme Court dismisses securities case, leaving fight over tender offer litigation for another day
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday punted a securities case testing the standard of liability for companies charged with misleading investors during the course of a tender offer, leaving in place, for the time being, a circuit split making it easier to pursue claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the West Coast.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday punted a securities case testing the standard of liability for companies charged with misleading investors during the course of a tender offer, leaving in place, for the time being, a circuit split making it easier to pursue claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the West Coast.
In a per curiam opinion, the high court said it had improvidently granted review of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
Related Content
U.S. Supreme Court, Securities, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
A private right to sue over tender offers
By Matthew W. Close, Yaira S. Dubin, Brittany A. Rogers
Securities
Varjabedian v. Emulex
Finding important differences between Rule 10b-5 and Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act, panel parts ways with five circuit courts to determine 14(e) claim need not prove scienter, only ne...
