Criminal,
Constitutional Law,
California Supreme Court
Jun. 6, 2019
Justices appear divided on proactive ‘Brady’ list disclosures
An information sharing practice the state Supreme Court once referred to as laudable is now squarely before the justices, this time for a decision on its legality.
An information sharing practice the state Supreme Court once referred to as laudable is now squarely before the justices, this time for a decision on its legality.
A lively and perhaps divided bench challenged three attorneys Wednesday on how law enforcement agencies and prosecutors can fulfill their constitutional mandate to share favorable evidence with criminal defendants while preserving the privacy rights of officers, from whose...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Criminal, Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court
Will court say ‘Brady tips’ strike acceptable balance?
By David P. Mastagni
Criminal, Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court
Brady v. Pitchess: A constitutional crisis 40 years in the making
By Naeun Rim
Constitutional Law
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept.)
Union representing sheriff’s deputies successful in modifying injunction to prohibit disclosure of so-called ‘Brady’ list of deputies absent a granted ‘Pitchess’ motion.