Government,
Constitutional Law
Oct. 30, 2019
Judicial opinion responding to Congress-executive clash is essential





John H. Minan
Emeritus Professor of Law
University of San Diego School of Law
Professor Minan is a former attorney with the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and the former chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board.
President Donald Trump continues to challenge the legal validity of numerous investigative subpoenas made by House committees. Trump generally advances two theories to support his challenges. The first is based on the lack of a valid "legislative purpose," which has been claimed in various cases demanding his financial records and tax returns. The second is a generalized claim of absolute immunity for presidential advisors from giving compelled testimony and documents...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In