Civil Litigation
Jan. 2, 2020
Appellate courts split on indemnity claims and anti-SLAPP
Three appellate courts recently reached different conclusions regarding whether a claim for contractual indemnity “arises from” protected petitioning activity within the meaning of California’s anti-SLAPP statute.
Three appellate courts recently reached different conclusions regarding whether a claim for contractual indemnity "arises from" protected petitioning activity within the meaning of California's anti-SLAPP statute. On Dec. 9, Division 4 of the 2nd District Court of Appeal held that such a claim does arise from protected activity. See Long Beac...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In