For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Insurance

Jan. 9, 2020

2019 review of California insurance law decisions

In 2019, California courts issued a number of interesting decisions on insurance issues. Three stand out.

Kirk A. Pasich

Partner and Co-Leader of the Insurance Recovery Group
McGuireWoods LLP

Phone: (310) 956-3462

Email: kpasich@mcguirewoods.com

Loyola Law School

See more...

In 2019, California courts issued a number of interesting decisions on insurance issues. Three stand out.

In Deere & Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 32 Cal. App. 5th 499 (2019), the court addressed a question about the interplay of primary and excess insurance policies and, in particular, whether an insured had to pay...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Insurance

Deere & Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Higher-layer excess policies were triggered once the first-layer excess policy limits, which were subject to a self-insured retention paid by plaintiff, had been exhausted; thus, judgment...

Insurance

Modification: Deere & Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Higher-layer excess policies were triggered once the first-layer excess policy limits, which were subject to a self-insured retention paid by plaintiff, had been exhausted; thus, judgment...

Insurance

Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. American Safety Indemnity Co.

Because judgment was secured against the insured 'in an action based upon... property damage,' the judgment creditor plaintiff may 'recover on the judgment' under Insurance Code Section 1...

Civil Procedure

Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co.

California's common law notice-prejudice rule is a fundamental public policy for the purpose of choice of law analysis; thus, case remanded to determine whether notice-prejudice rule appl...



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.