This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

State Bar & Bar Associations

Mar. 2, 2020

What will the California Attorney Practice Analysis group recommend?

The ACLU of California, Impact Fund and California ChangeLawyers in a chapter and verse letter dated Sept. 23, 2019, sent to the California Supreme Court, aver that the California bar exam cut score has a “deeply troubling” disparate racial impact that decreases diversity in the State’s legal community and is inexplicably high.

Joseph Robert Giannini

Director
Lawyers United Inc.

Email: j.r.giannini@verizon.net

Joseph is a member of the American Bar Association's Litigation Section and Legal Education and Admissions. He spearheaded legislation in California that was enacted into law in 2000 calling for full reciprocal admission for experienced sister-state attorneys, that was subsequently, diluted to provide only second-class limited bar admission privileges for corporate counsel and attorneys working for qualified pro bono organizations with the promise the issue would be re-visited in a few years.

The ACLU of California, Impact Fund and California ChangeLawyers in a chapter and verse letter dated Sept. 23, 2019, sent to the California Supreme Court, aver that the California bar exam cut score has a "deeply troubling" disparate racial impact that decreases diversity in the State's legal community and is inexplicably high. California Government Code Section 12944 prohibits licensing tests with disparate impact. These public interest groups further question whethe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up