This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Feb. 26, 2020

Can intentional tortfeasors shift liability to negligent actors?

California law has long dictated that intentional tortfeasors cannot shift their liability to a merely negligent actor. A pending Supreme Court case may change that.

Ted W. Pelletier

Partner
Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood PLC

Email: tpelletier@kazanlaw.com

In the 2020 term, the California Supreme Court is expected to decide whether intentional tortfeasors are entitled to the benefit of Proposition 51 (Civil Code Section 1431.2), under which civil defendants are liable for noneconomic damages only according to their "percentage of fault" as found by the jury. This decision will issue in B.B. v. County of Los Angeles, S250734, which is fully briefed and awaiting oral argument.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up