Letters,
Criminal,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Mar. 3, 2020
Column on overturned conviction is wrong on the facts and the law
Kent Scheidegger's Feb. 11 Daily Journal column, "The 9th Circuit ducks its judicial obligations in ruling" en banc in Ellis v. Harrison, tries but fails to obscure the racially driven conflicts of interest of Ezzard Ellis' trial counsel that compelled the overturning of his conviction.





Sanford Jay Rosen
Partner
Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld LLP
101 Mission Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco , CA 94105
Phone: (415) 433-6830
Fax: (415) 433-7104
Email: srosen@rbgg.com
Yale Law School; New Haven CT
Kent Scheidegger's Feb. 11 Daily Journal column, "The 9th Circuit ducks its judicial obligations in ruling" en banc in Ellis v. Harrison, tries but fails to obscure the racially driven conflicts of interest of Ezzard Ellis' trial counsel that compelled the overturning of his conviction.
$95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In