This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters,
Criminal,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Mar. 3, 2020

Column on overturned conviction is wrong on the facts and the law

Kent Scheidegger's Feb. 11 Daily Journal column, "The 9th Circuit ducks its judicial obligations in ruling" en banc in Ellis v. Harrison, tries but fails to obscure the racially driven conflicts of interest of Ezzard Ellis' trial counsel that compelled the overturning of his conviction.

Sanford Jay Rosen

Partner
Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld LLP

101 Mission Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco , CA 94105

Phone: (415) 433-6830

Fax: (415) 433-7104

Email: srosen@rbgg.com

Yale Law School; New Haven CT

Kent Scheidegger's Feb. 11 Daily Journal column, "The 9th Circuit ducks its judicial obligations in ruling" en banc in Ellis v. Harrison, tries but fails to obscure the racially driven conflicts of interest of Ezzard Ellis' trial counsel that compelled the overturning of his conviction.

$95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up