Law Practice,
Criminal
Mar. 5, 2020
A guide to effectively using body-camera evidence at trial
Even with the latest technology available, the actions and tactics of law enforcement are criticized by the media and the public. Juries often return large verdicts against law enforcement agencies. However, body-worn cameras may actually be reducing exposure to litigation and unwarranted citizens’ complaints.
Eugene Ramirez
Partner
Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP
Email: epr@manningllp.com
Eugene is a founding partner of the firm. He leads the Governmental Entity Liability, Military and Veterans Law, and School Civil Liability Teams. Mr. Ramirez is a frequently quoted national expert in police use of Body Worn Cameras. He serves as general counsel for both the California Association of Tactical Officers (CATO) and United States Police Canine Association and is a former legal section chair for the National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA).
Technology is constantly changing the role of law enforcement agencies, which are being challenged to deploy the latest technology to improve policies and procedures, weapons systems, and even on how officers perform daily duties. Meanwhile, the public is demanding -- and law enforcement is trying to provide -- as much transparency as legally permissible.
Even with the latest technology available, the actions and tactics of law enfo...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In