This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Tax

Mar. 6, 2020

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code revisited

In basic terms, Section 280E denies a marijuana business the ability to deduct its business expenses in computing its federal income tax liability.

Stanley S. Jutkowitz

Partner
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Stanley concentrates his practice on domestic and international business transactions, tax planning, and counseling on corporate, real estate and cannabis transactions. As the leader of the firm's cannabis law practice and founding editor of the firm's marijuana law blog, The Blunt Truth (www.blunttruthlaw.com), he stays current with the evolving law and counsels clients in navigating the uncertain legal landscape, guiding them through challenges to enable them to conduct business with the least amount of disruption.

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code revisited
New York Times News Service

Marijuana-related businesses should already know about Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code. In basic terms, Section 280E denies a marijuana business the ability to deduct its business expenses in computing its federal income tax liability. It was enacted into law in 1982 to reverse the holding of the U.S. Tax Court in Jeffrey Edmondson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1981-623, in which the Tax Court allowed a drug dealer to deduct certain ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up