This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Mar. 10, 2020

Government-hosted social media and the 1st Amendment

On Feb. 26, the 9th Circuit rejected the argument that the ubiquity of social media platforms as a means of communication rendered them subject to First Amendment scrutiny by the federal courts for decisions on what user speech to allow.

David Urban

Senior Counsel
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

Email: durban@lcwlegal.com

David Urban, senior counsel at Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, represents public and private educators as well as public agencies in all aspects of labor and employment law.

On Feb. 26, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided a landmark First Amendment case, Prager University v. Google LLC, 2020 DJDAR 1569. In its decision, the 9th Circuit rejected the argument that the ubiquity of social media platforms as a means of communication rendered them subject to First Amendment scrutiny by the federal courts for decisions on what u...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up