Civil Litigation
Mar. 10, 2020
Why you might get punished for failure to comply with demurrer rules
Last month a Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's sustaining of a demurrer in the case of Dumas v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors over Dumas' objections that the county failed to comply with Code of Civil Procedure Section 430.41(a)(4).
Susan Roche
Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLPEmail: sroche@hbblaw.com
Susan Roche is a member of the General Liability, Product Liability and Transportation Law Practice Groups. She focuses her practice on matters involving premises liability, product liability, personal injury and trucking & transportation law.
On Feb. 18, Division 4 of the 2nd District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's sustaining of a demurrer in the case of Dumas v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, 2020 DJDAR 1243, over Dumas' objections that the county failed to comply with Code of Civil Procedure Section 430.41(a)(4). Dumas contended that the county failed to meet and co...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Procedure
Dumas v. L.A. County Bd. of Supervisors
A determination by the court that a meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer.
Government
Olson v. Hornbrook Community Services Dist.
District violated Ralph M. Brown Act because it failed to adequately describe items it acted on in its consent agenda; thus, plaintiffs stated cause of action under Government Code Sectio...
