Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Apr. 21, 2020
Another look at the state Supreme Court’s inverse condemnation ruling in City of Oroville
The California Supreme Court, for the first time in more than two decades, recently waded into the murky inverse condemnation waters.
Mark S. Roth
Member
Cozen O'Connor
Email: mroth@cozen.com
Mark is a former office managing partner of the Los Angeles office of Cozen O'Connor, which he opened when he joined the firm in 1995.
The California Supreme Court, for the first time in more than two decades, recently waded into the murky inverse condemnation waters. The utility industry defense bar has hailed that decision, City of Oroville v. Superior Court, 7 Cal. 5th 1091 (2019), as the North Star for providing guidance on the current state of inverse condemnation law. In fact, even a cursory reading of that case suggests otherwise.
...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In