Real Estate/Development,
Appellate Practice
May 7, 2020
The virus on appeal, part 3
In my prior columns on this topic (which ran yesterday and the day before), I discussed various possible defenses a commercial tenant might have to a landlord’s claim for rent, when the tenant’s business has been adversely affected by the corona virus pandemic.
Myron Moskovitz
Legal Director
Moskovitz Appellate Team
90 Crocker Ave
Piedmont , CA 94611-3823
Phone: (510) 384-0354
Email: myronmoskovitz@gmail.com
UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hal
In my prior columns on this topic (which ran yesterday and the day before), I discussed various possible defenses a commercial tenant might have to a landlord’s claim for rent, when the tenant’s business has been adversely affected by the corona virus pandemic.
I concluded that the defense most likely to be viable is frustration of purpose, supported by a claim that the tenant’s purpose was frustrated by government orders (federal, ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In